Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

Age of Legends [standard] Mafia - Game Over


BFG

Recommended Posts

Posted

Shad. I did not jump straight to negative conclusions with you. I made it clear that your first post read as scummy to me. I challenged you on it and you responded with post #46 which i did not buy and saw as a nonchalant attempt. You then followed it up with post #50 which was way worse and i called you out again. I made it clear many times now that although your first response (#46) made me view you as more scummy i could still be persuaded in a vacuum to see it as geniuine. But then you repeated that behavior with post #50 that was another attempt at a brush off. These are reasonable issues that i have with your play. To say that i jumped to a conclusion is very disengenuious, considering it has also been pulling teeth with you ever since.

 

That WIFOM post you refer to is my genuine answer. I will not respond any other way than i did to a post that has no answer. I would humour someone else suggesting scum wouldnt have acted as you did. But you brought it up yourself to suggest your innocence. That is a WIFOM tactic and you know it. It did not provide any confidence in your alignment this game when your go to was so flimsy of a defense.

 

Also you keep asking the same question, which i then keep answering. Its all 1 repeated question. Then you say i dont answer it. We have a clear disconnect and the only answer i see as reasonable is that your scum.

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

 

And it's odd that you single this out considering I did directly engage you in another post.  (You initially blew it off with the WIFOM comment.)  I'm getting a Kivam in Pulp Fiction vibe.  >_>

 

I'm getting a BS vibe.

 

The reason that is being pointed out is because you reacted badly. You commented about him not being new. When he said he didn't believe you, Instead of explaining yourself, you waved it off by slipping into defensive mode with the quivering in your boots bit. It's swell that you explained later on... but your initial reaction was no bueno. So yes, it's gonna be pointed out.

 

 

Did it really happen that way?  Calder called me a liar and Clov asked for elaboration.  I rolled my eyes at Calder, explained myself to Clov, then went back to address Calder further.  "Avoiding explanation" was Calder's spin on the event.  Both posts were already on the table.  There was no "later on".

Posted

 

"Well I guess I have to stop in and say something" instead of "Hello!" felt half-hearted to me coming from someone who should be eager to kick off his first game, at least enough to point out.  From someone who has played a lot I treat it as null.

 

Why should lack of eagerness indicate scumyness though?  That's what you meant as too easy, right?  It depends on a person's preference. I know some players that don't give a rat's ass when they roll town, and it's when they roll scum that they come to life. And vice versa. But without knowing the player..... it's moot.

 

 

Eh, it pinged me.  Doesn't make him scum.  After AJ voted I figured the same thing pinged him too so I mentioned it but downplayed it.

Posted

 

 

[v]Calder[/v]

Scum.

 

Too easy probably, but it crossed my mind.

Post smells to me. Non-commital posts that half heartedly defend someone are by scum more often than not. Scum feel the need to make comments like this.

Gonna leave this here so people can see Shad's exaggeration of events. I did not call him a liar. I called out his actions as having a fake vibe that points towards scum alignment. A reasonable accusation, not a flat out your 100% scum call-out. He then proceeded to oddly play it off badly.

Posted

Lets cut the crap, okay?  I'm tired of you going off about the timing angle. Fortunately I know how to read... and also how to quote!  That's the sequence of posts. Your initial response to Calder shaking in your boots happened. 10 minutes later you expanded in response to Clov. 

 

 

Obligatory post. Content......more content....noy scum.

 

 

 

[v]Calder[/v]

Scum.

 

Too easy probably, but it crossed my mind.

 

 

 

 

 

[v]Calder[/v]
Scum.

 
Too easy probably, but it crossed my mind.

Post smells to me. Non-commital posts that half heartedly defend someone are by scum more often than not. Scum feel the need to make comments like this.

 

 

 

Oh hey this isn't actually your first mafia game.

 

 

 

 

 

[v]Calder[/v]
Scum.

 
Too easy probably, but it crossed my mind.

Post smells to me. Non-commital posts that half heartedly defend someone are by scum more often than not. Scum feel the need to make comments like this.

 

 

So you think he was defending you by saying it was too easy?

 

 

Shad - What was it about Calder's posts that stood out to you?

 

 

 

 

Oh hey this isn't actually your first mafia game.


Nonchalant response attempt noted, but not believed.

 

 

 

 

 

Oh hey this isn't actually your first mafia game.


Nonchalant response attempt noted, but not believed.

 

 

I'm trembling in fear.  My sweaty fingers can barely complete the keystrokes necessary to relay this message.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[v]Calder[/v]
Scum.

 
Too easy probably, but it crossed my mind.

Post smells to me. Non-commital posts that half heartedly defend someone are by scum more often than not. Scum feel the need to make comments like this.

 

 

So you think he was defending you by saying it was too easy?

 

 

Shad - What was it about Calder's posts that stood out to you?

 

 

I thought this was his first game because I don't actually read everyone else's sign-up thread spam when I spam sign-up thread and never made it past the part where he said he was new.  I read it as disgruntled/half-hearted like 'great I have no idea what I'm doing and I have to be scum.'

 

 

 

 

All you had to do is say the exact same thing you said to Clov..... only to Calder. But you didn't. Your knee jerk reaction was to get oddly defensive and not be forthcoming with a response. Why? Because he said he didn't believe you. Well... welcome to mafia... we're all ****ing paranoid. 

Posted

*Your initial response to Calder shaking in your boots happened.  Then 10 minutes later you expanded in response to Clov. 

Posted

Morrrrrning

 

Catching up I like the whole Calder, Shad, Clov interaction. I dunno how to feel about Laine.

 

Dislike Dice so far. Null on Zander.

Posted

 

 

band core nearly bit me in the ass last game, so i'm quite careful. Willing to risk it for now, no guarantees  for the later stages ofthe game though

 

I think Band core was an excellent idea last game. :tongue:

 

But I think I may have finally learned how to read you.  Well, further in at least.  You will be eternally D1 null.

 

More posting by Shad following callouts that go unacknowledged. Scum is FROZEN.

 

Are you going to push this angle any time I interact with other players in the thread?

Posted

 

 

Oh hey this isn't actually your first mafia game.

Nonchalant response attempt noted, but not believed.

 

Gonna leave this here so people can see Shad's exaggeration of events. I did not call him a liar. I called out his actions as having a fake vibe that points towards scum alignment. A reasonable accusation, not a flat out your 100% scum call-out. He then proceeded to oddly play it off badly.

 

Fixed your quote to the one we're actually discussing. Explain to me how you are not calling me a liar here.

Posted

 

 

 

band core nearly bit me in the ass last game, so i'm quite careful. Willing to risk it for now, no guarantees  for the later stages ofthe game though

 

 

I think Band core was an excellent idea last game. :tongue:

 

But I think I may have finally learned how to read you.  Well, further in at least.  You will be eternally D1 null.

More posting by Shad following callouts that go unacknowledged. Scum is FROZEN.

Are you going to push this angle any time I interact with other players in the thread?

Your wondering if i will call you out on popping in to respond to a fluff post and then leaving, while not acknowledging questions that were asked of you hours before? Yes, i can say with certainty that i will call you out on this every time.

Posted

 

 

 

Oh hey this isn't actually your first mafia game.

Nonchalant response attempt noted, but not believed.
Gonna leave this here so people can see Shad's exaggeration of events. I did not call him a liar. I called out his actions as having a fake vibe that points towards scum alignment. A reasonable accusation, not a flat out your 100% scum call-out. He then proceeded to oddly play it off badly.
Fixed your quote to the one we're actually discussing. Explain to me how you are not calling me a liar here.

My mistake for thinking you would want to start our analysis of events from the beginning. But, yea i basically called you a liar in that post.if you take offense to that then your in the wrong game. It was my second response to you (first i already quoted above) and it was to put you on your back foot and get a response. I was open on my stance until you tried to play it off again. Then it became my stance for real. Your scum.

Posted

Lets cut the crap, okay?  I'm tired of you going off about the timing angle. Fortunately I know how to read... and also how to quote!  That's the sequence of posts. Your initial response to Calder shaking in your boots happened. 10 minutes later you expanded in response to Clov. 

 

 

Obligatory post. Content......more content....noy scum.

 

 

 

[v]Calder[/v]

 

Scum.

 

Too easy probably, but it crossed my mind.

 

 

 

 

 

[v]Calder[/v]

Scum.

 

Too easy probably, but it crossed my mind.

 

Post smells to me. Non-commital posts that half heartedly defend someone are by scum more often than not. Scum feel the need to make comments like this.

 

 

 

Oh hey this isn't actually your first mafia game.

 

 

 

 

 

[v]Calder[/v]

Scum.

 

Too easy probably, but it crossed my mind.

 

Post smells to me. Non-commital posts that half heartedly defend someone are by scum more often than not. Scum feel the need to make comments like this.

 

 

So you think he was defending you by saying it was too easy?

 

 

Shad - What was it about Calder's posts that stood out to you?

 

 

 

 

Oh hey this isn't actually your first mafia game.

Nonchalant response attempt noted, but not believed.

 

 

 

 

 

Oh hey this isn't actually your first mafia game.

Nonchalant response attempt noted, but not believed.

 

 

I'm trembling in fear.  My sweaty fingers can barely complete the keystrokes necessary to relay this message.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[v]Calder[/v]

Scum.

 

Too easy probably, but it crossed my mind.

 

Post smells to me. Non-commital posts that half heartedly defend someone are by scum more often than not. Scum feel the need to make comments like this.

 

 

So you think he was defending you by saying it was too easy?

 

 

Shad - What was it about Calder's posts that stood out to you?

 

 

I thought this was his first game because I don't actually read everyone else's sign-up thread spam when I spam sign-up thread and never made it past the part where he said he was new.  I read it as disgruntled/half-hearted like 'great I have no idea what I'm doing and I have to be scum.'

 

 

 

 

All you had to do is say the exact same thing you said to Clov..... only to Calder. But you didn't. Your knee jerk reaction was to get oddly defensive and not be forthcoming with a response. Why? Because he said he didn't believe you. Well... welcome to mafia... we're all ****ing paranoid.

 

 

 

*Your initial response to Calder shaking in your boots happened.  Then 10 minutes later you expanded in response to Clov. 

 

Are you seriously calling me out because my posts came 9 minutes apart?  And why should I politely correct Calder calling me a liar when I could accomplish the same thing answering Clov?  How is a knee-jerk reaction to Calder bad?

Posted

 

 

 

 

band core nearly bit me in the ass last game, so i'm quite careful. Willing to risk it for now, no guarantees  for the later stages ofthe game though

 

I think Band core was an excellent idea last game. :tongue:

 

But I think I may have finally learned how to read you.  Well, further in at least.  You will be eternally D1 null.

More posting by Shad following callouts that go unacknowledged. Scum is FROZEN.
Are you going to push this angle any time I interact with other players in the thread?

Your wondering if i will call you out on popping in to respond to a fluff post and then leaving, while not acknowledging questions that were asked of you hours before? Yes, i can say with certainty that i will call you out on this every time.

 

 

Show me a post I have not addressed besides #226.  And explain to me how you haven't done exactly what you are accusing me of.

Posted

 

 

 

 

Oh hey this isn't actually your first mafia game.

Nonchalant response attempt noted, but not believed.
Gonna leave this here so people can see Shad's exaggeration of events. I did not call him a liar. I called out his actions as having a fake vibe that points towards scum alignment. A reasonable accusation, not a flat out your 100% scum call-out. He then proceeded to oddly play it off badly.
Fixed your quote to the one we're actually discussing. Explain to me how you are not calling me a liar here.

My mistake for thinking you would want to start our analysis of events from the beginning. But, yea i basically called you a liar in that post.if you take offense to that then your in the wrong game. It was my second response to you (first i already quoted above) and it was to put you on your back foot and get a response. I was open on my stance until you tried to play it off again. Then it became my stance for real. Your scum.

 

 

If I refer to the post where you called me a liar and you quote a different post and say look guys, Shad is lying, I didn't call him a liar, you can't just back off and say 'well excuse me for wanting to start from the beginning'.  You are spinning the conversation again.

Posted

@Shad

 

I am calling you out for the timing because you're claiming Calder is misrepping you by stating the order of events wrong. He is, in fact, not doing that. Because your reaction to him saying he didn't believe you was you quivering in your boots response. You only later expanded to Clov... I don't really care if it was 1 minute later, 10 minutes or 5 hours. Fact of the matter is you did wave it off with a defensive response INITIALLY.

 

As for me, I prolly tend to put more weight on initial reactions because I think they're a lot more telling than ones where a player has time to think it over. Your initial response was a bad one. If you had an explanation for your comment and thinking he was new, then I would expect you to just spell it out. Instead you just spazzed. I didn't care for it. Your question later on about what scum would do was obtuse. Didn't really care for that either. I also think Calder responded well... so I don't really get how he's not answering you.

Posted

Shad. I did not jump straight to negative conclusions with you. I made it clear that your first post read as scummy to me. I challenged you on it and you responded with post #46 which i did not buy and saw as a nonchalant attempt. You then followed it up with post #50 which was way worse and i called you out again. I made it clear many times now that although your first response (#46) made me view you as more scummy i could still be persuaded in a vacuum to see it as geniuine. But then you repeated that behavior with post #50 that was another attempt at a brush off. These are reasonable issues that i have with your play. To say that i jumped to a conclusion is very disengenuious, considering it has also been pulling teeth with you ever since.

 

That WIFOM post you refer to is my genuine answer. I will not respond any other way than i did to a post that has no answer. I would humour someone else suggesting scum wouldnt have acted as you did. But you brought it up yourself to suggest your innocence. That is a WIFOM tactic and you know it. It did not provide any confidence in your alignment this game when your go to was so flimsy of a defense.

 

Also you keep asking the same question, which i then keep answering. Its all 1 repeated question. Then you say i dont answer it. We have a clear disconnect and the only answer i see as reasonable is that your scum.

 

Red never happened.  You spun the question into WIFOM/self-defense.  I have repeatedly clarified that this wasn't the question and you continue to ignore it and say this is your final answer.  And I asked you like a dozen questions in my last post.  You hand picked the one you've been focused on all game and continue to refuse to acknowledge that I challenged your interpretation of it.

Posted

@Shad

 

I am calling you out for the timing because you're claiming Calder is misrepping you by stating the order of events wrong. He is, in fact, not doing that. Because your reaction to him saying he didn't believe you was you quivering in your boots response. You only later expanded to Clov... I don't really care if it was 1 minute later, 10 minutes or 5 hours. Fact of the matter is you did wave it off with a defensive response INITIALLY.

 

As for me, I prolly tend to put more weight on initial reactions because I think they're a lot more telling than ones where a player has time to think it over. Your initial response was a bad one. If you had an explanation for your comment and thinking he was new, then I would expect you to just spell it out. Instead you just spazzed. I didn't care for it. Your question later on about what scum would do was obtuse. Didn't really care for that either. I also think Calder responded well... so I don't really get how he's not answering you.

 

Look at this BS post.  You are lying.

Posted

 

 

 

 

 

Oh hey this isn't actually your first mafia game.

 

Nonchalant response attempt noted, but not believed.
Gonna leave this here so people can see Shad's exaggeration of events. I did not call him a liar. I called out his actions as having a fake vibe that points towards scum alignment. A reasonable accusation, not a flat out your 100% scum call-out. He then proceeded to oddly play it off badly.
Fixed your quote to the one we're actually discussing. Explain to me how you are not calling me a liar here.

My mistake for thinking you would want to start our analysis of events from the beginning. But, yea i basically called you a liar in that post.if you take offense to that then your in the wrong game. It was my second response to you (first i already quoted above) and it was to put you on your back foot and get a response. I was open on my stance until you tried to play it off again. Then it became my stance for real. Your scum.

 

If I refer to the post where you called me a liar and you quote a different post and say look guys, Shad is lying, I didn't call him a liar, you can't just back off and say 'well excuse me for wanting to start from the beginning'.  You are spinning the conversation again.

I don't believe i am spinning anything. I believed your point was that i called you a liar immediately. I misread you, but tbh i dont feel bad bc your kind of all over the place. You keep bringing up this timeline issue when everything you quote proves my side of events. If nyn wasnt nailing home this exact point then i might have gone insane. I have zero clue what your line of reasoning is here.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...