Ghost Mafia - 3 out of 33 survive - Town wins!

[RandA lThor]

 

I have a feeling that no one read my post...

 

I read it. It's relevancy was old. 

 

fair enough, just wanted to make sure it wasn't skimmed over

[鲍勃不是我的名字]

I have a feeling that no one read my post...

 

I read it.  Props for the English lesson.

 

You voted for "No Lynch".  

 

Just not a fan of your thesis.

[Gabriel Kross]

Voting Nolder is the way to go

[Nolder]

 

Maybe this is nothing. Maybe it is. 3 is Ape´s lucky number. Why mention that?

 

Also, 3 is a lucky number for me. 

 

Peace knows better than voting number 3 on a train, especially in a game this large. Number 3 happen to be Ape who mentioned number 3 before.

 

 

It's about time, now we can have an epic peace vs ep arguement for old times sake

 

I'm ready.

 

Current Vote Count:

 

Mish (1) - Cloud

RTE (1) - Nolder

Peace (1) - NotBob

Ape (1) - Rand

NotBob (1) - EP

Ishy (1) - Tress

EP (2) - Ithi, Turin

Ithi (4) - Crush, Wombat, Ape, Leelou

Turin (1) - Kronos

 

With 33 players, it takes 17 to lynch. The hour turns May 19th,  9:00 am.

 

VOTE APE

 

For being the 3rd voter.  3rd voter is a great place for scum to hide.

 

 

That reminds me. I asked Ape whether the lucky number thing was game related or not. I don't think he ever answered me which is telling I think.

[RandA lThor]

 

I have a feeling that no one read my post...

 

I read it.  Props for the English lesson.

 

You voted for "No Lynch".  

 

Just not a fan of your thesis.

 

 

Which one?  I talked about several different things.

 

 

 

Voting Nolder is the way to go

Did you read the English part?

[Tyler Glembo]

vote Peace

 

 

Rand, I read your post.  I agree, as soon as someone uses an item they should post in the thread that they did and what happen. 

[Niniel]

The third voter thing is something I've done several times before to get reactions.  I did this many pages back.

 

I have no clue why Ape referenced the #3 many pages later. 

 

Do you have an opinion on current events?

 

If you say so.

 

I feel kind of lost. If we only have two mafia then it will be hard to find them. Still think we should try but don´t know where to start. Maybe with Nolder or Rand? 

[Niniel]

 

 

Maybe this is nothing. Maybe it is. 3 is Ape´s lucky number. Why mention that?

 

Also, 3 is a lucky number for me. 

 

Peace knows better than voting number 3 on a train, especially in a game this large. Number 3 happen to be Ape who mentioned number 3 before.

 

 

It's about time, now we can have an epic peace vs ep arguement for old times sake

 

I'm ready.

 

Current Vote Count:

 

Mish (1) - Cloud

RTE (1) - Nolder

Peace (1) - NotBob

Ape (1) - Rand

NotBob (1) - EP

Ishy (1) - Tress

EP (2) - Ithi, Turin

Ithi (4) - Crush, Wombat, Ape, Leelou

Turin (1) - Kronos

 

With 33 players, it takes 17 to lynch. The hour turns May 19th,  9:00 am.

 

VOTE APE

 

For being the 3rd voter.  3rd voter is a great place for scum to hide.

 

 

That reminds me. I asked Ape whether the lucky number thing was game related or not. I don't think he ever answered me which is telling I think.

 

 

Yes. That is one of the reasons I caught it.

[Gabriel Kross]

 

 

I have a feeling that no one read my post...

 

I read it.  Props for the English lesson.

 

You voted for "No Lynch".  

 

Just not a fan of your thesis.

 

 

Which one?  I talked about several different things.

 

 

 

Voting Nolder is the way to go

Did you read the English part?

 

it's not a matter of grammar it's a matter of how it reads and to me it reads like he slipped so until I feel otherwise I'm going with it. Though I'm highly positive Nolder is mafia even excluding that comment.

[Gabriel Kross]

vote Peace

 

 

Rand, I read your post.  I agree, as soon as someone uses an item they should post in the thread that they did and what happen. 

Absofrickinglutely not, this is a worse suggestion than voting no lynch at the start of the phase.

[peacesells]

vote Peace

 

 

Rand, I read your post.  I agree, as soon as someone uses an item they should post in the thread that they did and what happen. 

 

Are you being forced to vote me...or do you have a reason?

[Tyler Glembo]

 

vote Peace

 

 

Rand, I read your post.  I agree, as soon as someone uses an item they should post in the thread that they did and what happen. 

Absofrickinglutely not, this is a worse suggestion than voting no lynch at the start of the phase.

 

 

Why?  As soon as the item becomes active the person goes back to vanilla town, right?  It is not revealing a power role.  Do you think items can be countered?

 

 

vote Peace

 

 

Rand, I read your post.  I agree, as soon as someone uses an item they should post in the thread that they did and what happen. 

 

Are you being forced to vote me...or do you have a reason?

 

 

You jumped pretty hard on the Nolder slip.  I read it and initially took it the way he claims he intended, about whether or not town can stop possessed recruiting.  It seemed like you were being opportunistic.

[peacesells]

Thanks for the explanation.

[Gabriel Kross]

 

 

vote Peace

 

 

Rand, I read your post.  I agree, as soon as someone uses an item they should post in the thread that they did and what happen. 

Absofrickinglutely not, this is a worse suggestion than voting no lynch at the start of the phase.

 

 

Why?  As soon as the item becomes active the person goes back to vanilla town, right?  It is not revealing a power role.  Do you think items can be countered?

 

 

vote Peace

 

 

Rand, I read your post.  I agree, as soon as someone uses an item they should post in the thread that they did and what happen. 

 

Are you being forced to vote me...or do you have a reason?

 

 

You jumped pretty hard on the Nolder slip.  I read it and initially took it the way he claims he intended, about whether or not town can stop possessed recruiting.  It seemed like you were being opportunistic.

 

Because first off, now that the recruiting mechanism has been confirmed it clears no one, I myself am only a 100% gurranteed town until the end of the phase, I'm probably the likely target for recruitment as well. The FLIR item was wasted, instead of clearing me, we could have cleaned up this mess with Nolder right quick. This is why I say a townie jumped the gun phase 1 in killing Turin, because again someone jumped the gun and used an item instead of taking time to think about it.

 

Also you are assuming all items are the same, odds are there are some more powerful than others. I was thinking what if the cellphones being dead was a reference to an item being blocked? That suggestion early on about EMP would make a right handy role block mechanism. There are just to many variables at this time to be suggesting anyone reveal their actions, it's like asking for the cop to step forward with no cause to do so.

[peacesells]

 

 

You jumped pretty hard on the Nolder slip.  I read it and initially took it the way he claims he intended, about whether or not town can stop possessed recruiting.  It seemed like you were being opportunistic.

 

 

 

Why not EP? He's voting Nolder for the same reason.

[Gabriel Kross]

 

 

 

You jumped pretty hard on the Nolder slip.  I read it and initially took it the way he claims he intended, about whether or not town can stop possessed recruiting.  It seemed like you were being opportunistic.

 

 

 

Why not EP? He's voting Nolder for the same reason.

 

Did you miss where I'm 100% town for this phase?

[RandA lThor]

 

 

 

I have a feeling that no one read my post...

 

I read it.  Props for the English lesson.

 

You voted for "No Lynch".  

 

Just not a fan of your thesis.

 

 

Which one?  I talked about several different things.

 

 

 

Voting Nolder is the way to go

Did you read the English part?

 

it's not a matter of grammar it's a matter of how it reads and to me it reads like he slipped so until I feel otherwise I'm going with it. Though I'm highly positive Nolder is mafia even excluding that comment.

 

That made absolutely no sense.  I get that you think Nolder is mafia without the slip, but it is not a matter of how you read it.  That statement invalidates the entire field of English itself, grammar oversteps what you think it is.

 

 

 

 

vote Peace

 

 

Rand, I read your post.  I agree, as soon as someone uses an item they should post in the thread that they did and what happen. 

Absofrickinglutely not, this is a worse suggestion than voting no lynch at the start of the phase.

 

 

Why?  As soon as the item becomes active the person goes back to vanilla town, right?  It is not revealing a power role.  Do you think items can be countered?

 

 

vote Peace

 

 

Rand, I read your post.  I agree, as soon as someone uses an item they should post in the thread that they did and what happen. 

 

Are you being forced to vote me...or do you have a reason?

 

 

You jumped pretty hard on the Nolder slip.  I read it and initially took it the way he claims he intended, about whether or not town can stop possessed recruiting.  It seemed like you were being opportunistic.

 

Because first off, now that the recruiting mechanism has been confirmed it clears no one, I myself am only a 100% gurranteed town until the end of the phase, I'm probably the likely target for recruitment as well. The FLIR item was wasted, instead of clearing me, we could have cleaned up this mess with Nolder right quick. This is why I say a townie jumped the gun phase 1 in killing Turin, because again someone jumped the gun and used an item instead of taking time to think about it.

 

Also you are assuming all items are the same, odds are there are some more powerful than others. I was thinking what if the cellphones being dead was a reference to an item being blocked? That suggestion early on about EMP would make a right handy role block mechanism. There are just to many variables at this time to be suggesting anyone reveal their actions, it's like asking for the cop to step forward with no cause to do so.

 

Not the same thing as asking the cop to step forward.  Cop still is able to view people and has a use.  After someone uses a power, they are vanilla, and mafia would have no more reason to kill them then to kill anyone else.  However, town will have more information.

[Gabriel Kross]

That is an assumption, an assumption does not make it fact Rand

[Tyler Glembo]

 

Because first off, now that the recruiting mechanism has been confirmed it clears no one, I myself am only a 100% gurranteed town until the end of the phase, I'm probably the likely target for recruitment as well. The FLIR item was wasted, instead of clearing me, we could have cleaned up this mess with Nolder right quick. This is why I say a townie jumped the gun phase 1 in killing Turin, because again someone jumped the gun and used an item instead of taking time to think about it. 

 

Also you are assuming all items are the same, odds are there are some more powerful than others. I was thinking what if the cellphones being dead was a reference to an item being blocked? That suggestion early on about EMP would make a right handy role block mechanism. There are just to many variables at this time to be suggesting anyone reveal their actions, it's like asking for the cop to step forward with no cause to do so.

 

 

I think that clearing you was a good move as you also had some pressure on you.  I also don't agree about the cop analogy because a cop will have future power also whereas an item user may not. 

 

However, I take your point that it depends on the item.  The reason I was thinking of to not reveal has nothing to do with items, but rather recruitment.  People who used items can still be recruited, which means their reveal may not help town long term.  However, I still lean toward the reveal because at least it is one person who is town during that phase. 

 

 

Why not EP? He's voting Nolder for the same reason.

 

 

EP was mod vetted.

[Talya]

 

 

Current Vote Count:

 

TGlems (1) - Ape

Leelou (1) - Mish

No Lynch (1) - Wombat

Wombat (1) - Nolder

Nolder (4) - EP, Cloud, Peace, Hally

 

With 32 players, it takes 17 to lynch. The hour will turn on Tuesday, May 21, 9:00 am EST unless a lynch is reached first

 

 

So this is the vote count so far. We need to get a lynch by the end of today...

 

VOTE NOL

 

Deadline is Tuesday morning, do you think Nol is scum or are you rushing to vote?

 

I saw DPR write 9pm where he had written about how many had been possessed. I didn't check the count

[Talya]

I will unvote when on my laptop

[Talya]

Everyone needs to visit the link Nol gave for DPR games and read the vampire hunter game. People die in this game so it is different but it will give you an idea.

[Gabriel Kross]

I had little real pressure on me though, Just Ithi and Notbob really, Wombat's only reason for wanting to get rid of me is because I was being me.

[peacesells]

 

 

 

 

You jumped pretty hard on the Nolder slip.  I read it and initially took it the way he claims he intended, about whether or not town can stop possessed recruiting.  It seemed like you were being opportunistic.

 

 

 

Why not EP? He's voting Nolder for the same reason.

 

Did you miss where I'm 100% town for this phase?

 

No..see my answer below.

 

 

 

Because first off, now that the recruiting mechanism has been confirmed it clears no one, I myself am only a 100% gurranteed town until the end of the phase, I'm probably the likely target for recruitment as well. The FLIR item was wasted, instead of clearing me, we could have cleaned up this mess with Nolder right quick. This is why I say a townie jumped the gun phase 1 in killing Turin, because again someone jumped the gun and used an item instead of taking time to think about it. 

 

Also you are assuming all items are the same, odds are there are some more powerful than others. I was thinking what if the cellphones being dead was a reference to an item being blocked? That suggestion early on about EMP would make a right handy role block mechanism. There are just to many variables at this time to be suggesting anyone reveal their actions, it's like asking for the cop to step forward with no cause to do so.

 

 

I think that clearing you was a good move as you also had some pressure on you.  I also don't agree about the cop analogy because a cop will have future power also whereas an item user may not. 

 

However, I take your point that it depends on the item.  The reason I was thinking of to not reveal has nothing to do with items, but rather recruitment.  People who used items can still be recruited, which means their reveal may not help town long term.  However, I still lean toward the reveal because at least it is one person who is town during that phase. 

 

 

Why not EP? He's voting Nolder for the same reason.

 

 

EP was mod vetted.

 

 

So, per your understanding..it's possible a vetted town player votes for Nolder for the same reasoning that I do..yet I can't be town.  Do you not see the logic fail there? 

[Gabriel Kross]

For once I will have to agree to agree with Peace though I will do so kicking and screaming the entire way