Ghost Mafia - 3 out of 33 survive - Town wins!

[Verbal32]

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

[Hallia]

Oh I did let it drop on thread. ^-^

[Hallia]

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

That's pretty good advice.   There's many people in this game I've never played with, or very much if I have before, so I don't know their metas.

[John McClane]

 

I can't frakking read any of this stupidity.

 

Ithi and EPeen are both hot mess.

 

Kill them both. Game is too crowded, need bodies on the floor, and things to transpire to figure it out.

 

Turd crumbing  to cover for future skimming accusations?  Is the Ape dead yet?

 

 

Not sure I understand what you are saying... is this an accusation? I hope so. If so.... I encourage you to go frak yourself you tub of poops!

[_CLOUD]

Unvote, Vote Turin

[michellem]

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

I know, and for my part it's only an observation; I haven't placed them on either end of the scale yet. Just means they're not doing any atypical stuff so far.

[Verbal32]

 

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

That's pretty good advice.   There's many people in this game I've never played with, or very much if I have before, so I don't know their metas.

 

 

Which makes you a dangerous scumhunter if you're town - you won't be fooled by the silly meta references.

[John McClane]

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

 

I encourage this... because it's undeniably bad play, and meets every expectation I have of the awful player here at DM.

[John McClane]

 

 

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

That's pretty good advice.   There's many people in this game I've never played with, or very much if I have before, so I don't know their metas.

 

 

Which makes you a dangerous scumhunter if you're town - you won't be fooled by the silly meta references.

 

 

I wonder if he/she will be fooled by the blatant buddying-up?

[Verbal32]

 

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

I know, and for my part it's only an observation; I haven't placed them on either end of the scale yet. Just means they're not doing any atypical stuff so far.

 

 

Which basically puts it as a null tell and places them with everybody else you have no idea on.  Your post makes me think you're saying something for the sake of contribution and playing along.

 

Vote:  Mish

[peacesells]

 

 

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

That's pretty good advice.   There's many people in this game I've never played with, or very much if I have before, so I don't know their metas.

 

 

Which makes you a dangerous scumhunter if you're town - you won't be fooled by the silly meta references.

 

 

She's scum.  I'm not really buying the whole "I didn't receive a PM act."

[Verbal32]

 

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

 

I encourage this... because it's undeniably bad play, and meets every expectation I have of the awful player here at DM.

 

 

Why not try to help, then?  Create an atmosphere of better gameplay, and it helps everybody.  Stop being so one-way.....they name streets after people like you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

That's pretty good advice.   There's many people in this game I've never played with, or very much if I have before, so I don't know their metas.

 

 

Which makes you a dangerous scumhunter if you're town - you won't be fooled by the silly meta references.

 

 

I wonder if he/she will be fooled by the blatant buddying-up?

 

 

Might have if you had kept yer trap shut.

[鲍勃不是我的名字]

Just an observation but Verbal reminds me of Basil and EP reminds me of Manuel in this set of skits:

 

[Hallia]

 

 

 

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

That's pretty good advice.   There's many people in this game I've never played with, or very much if I have before, so I don't know their metas.

 

 

Which makes you a dangerous scumhunter if you're town - you won't be fooled by the silly meta references.

 

 

I wonder if he/she will be fooled by the blatant buddying-up?

 

 

I learned my lesson about buddying from my first game with Nolder >.< And yes, I'm a she.

[Leelou]

 

 

 

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

That's pretty good advice.   There's many people in this game I've never played with, or very much if I have before, so I don't know their metas.

 

 

Which makes you a dangerous scumhunter if you're town - you won't be fooled by the silly meta references.

 

 

She's scum.  I'm not really buying the whole "I didn't receive a PM act."

 

 

I can semi believe it. Some people really don't read the rules to games. 

[michellem]

 

 

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

 

I know, and for my part it's only an observation; I haven't placed them on either end of the scale yet. Just means they're not doing any atypical stuff so far.

 

Which basically puts it as a null tell and places them with everybody else you have no idea on.  Your post makes me think you're saying something for the sake of contribution and playing along.

 

Vote:  Mish

Nope, it's a neutral tell. Might be semantics, but to me there's a difference.

[michellem]

 

 

I can semi believe it. Some people really don't read the rules to games.

 

This. Some are more guilty of this than others *eyes Peace* lol

[Verbal32]

Just an observation but Verbal reminds me of Basil and EP reminds me of Manuel in this set of skits:

 

 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[_CLOUD]

lol

[Verbal32]

 

 

 

 

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

That's pretty good advice.   There's many people in this game I've never played with, or very much if I have before, so I don't know their metas.

 

 

Which makes you a dangerous scumhunter if you're town - you won't be fooled by the silly meta references.

 

 

I wonder if he/she will be fooled by the blatant buddying-up?

 

 

I learned my lesson about buddying from my first game with Nolder >.< And yes, I'm a she.

 

 

Apparently the 'Gender: female' escaped his notice.

[Hallia]

I normally do first; but I saw the game had started and panicked.  I've never seen not getting one be a rule before.  Consider me thoroughly chastened at move along.

[Verbal32]

 

 

 

I see folks saying "xxx and yyy are just doing their thing".  Think that perhaps people would use this meta to hide?  That's the problem with scumhunting (or lack thereof) based on meta - you miss the people that are playing you as a result.  Hunt based on posts/reactions/evidence in this game - forget the rest, for the most part.

I know, and for my part it's only an observation; I haven't placed them on either end of the scale yet. Just means they're not doing any atypical stuff so far.

 

Which basically puts it as a null tell and places them with everybody else you have no idea on.  Your post makes me think you're saying something for the sake of contribution and playing along.

 

Vote:  Mish

Nope, it's a neutral tell. Might be semantics, but to me there's a difference.

 

 

You're right.

 

 

It is semantics.

[Ithillian Turambar]

 

 

Ithi picking on EP when she gets heat smells like deflection to me.

Agreed. I have more catching up to do before I want to vote, though. Lots more. This game's going to be a b**ch to keep up with. I can see it already.

Again no one has actually responded to the fact I pointed out - which is that I started 'picking' on EP and voting him before all this so called heat came out of the woodwork.

 

So Lily is agreeing with and actually voting because of a fallacy.

 

And Meta is pretty rubbish and useless for me. I can only really base stuff what I remember and what happens as it happens. People use meta as a reason when they don't actually have a real reason - but want to seem like they have a reason.

[LilyElizabeth]

As for Hally's not reading the rules, I can't throw stones there. I don't always read them all the way through, either. I did this time, because we all know DPR is evil, but I don't always. So, for me, that's no tell at all. 

[Verbal32]

 

 

Ithi picking on EP when she gets heat smells like deflection to me.

Agreed. I have more catching up to do before I want to vote, though. Lots more. This game's going to be a b**ch to keep up with. I can see it already.

Again no one has actually responded to the fact I pointed out - which is that I started 'picking' on EP and voting him before all this so called heat came out of the woodwork.

 

So Lily is agreeing with and actually voting because of a fallacy.

 

And Meta is pretty rubbish and useless for me. I can only really base stuff what I remember and what happens as it happens. People use meta as a reason when they don't actually have a real reason - but want to seem like they have a reason.

 

 

Hence my vote on Mish.