Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

Kae's [BASIC] X-Men Mafia GAME OVER! TOWN WINS!!!


Sakaea

Recommended Posts

Posted

FOS@Mynd: why always suspicious of the first player to bring someone to 2 votes? seems a bit arbitrary.

 

Not to mention the "mouse peeing on cotton" analogy. *peering hard at Mynd* Might be scum just because of the ick factor! :tongue:

  • Replies 555
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

OMGUS!!! VOTE: BASEL

 

that movie is my fav out of the 5 x-men. that is, untill they do a Gambit origin and a 4 horse men story line :baalzamon:

but i demand to be included in the cannon discussion :unsure:

oh I saw that

 

that's supposed to be a reboot? I thought it was just another prequel

 

i thought it was a prequel as well :blink:

 

I thought it was somehow a reboot and a prequel. If that makes any sense. Red, you vote for me shouldn't count cause it's not bold red :tongue:. My vote for you wasn't serious, but it has been pending a better idea... I'm still having trouble making up my mind on a "real" vote. As for Gambit, I thought he was really badly cast in the Wolverine movie. I liked the early '90s cartoon version of Gambit better than the film one. And if you want to be in the cannon discussion, here you go:

 

molly-pitcher.jpg

Posted

FOS@Mynd: why always suspicious of the first player to bring someone to 2 votes? seems a bit arbitrary.

I suspect anyone voting for Red after her all but blatant reveal would be some form of mafia Gambit in my opinion.

 

FOS@Mynd: why always suspicious of the first player to bring someone to 2 votes? seems a bit arbitrary.

 

Not to mention the "mouse peeing on cotton" analogy. *peering hard at Mynd* Might be scum just because of the ick factor! :tongue:

 

Mouse peeing on cotton is a Southern expression.

Posted

so i think the turin and nolder thang was just some town on town. Although regardless of it being a joke vote or breadcrumming potential lynches. I cant stand when people go straight for the big game. Its no fun and not fair for them.

 

I have no clue whats up with nolder and red..it seems like they are still doing some joke voting. It was quite random. I get the feeling that mynd is a very paranoid person rolleyes.gif

Posted

I get the feeling that mynd is a very paranoid person rolleyes.gif

 

Or a bizarre southerner. SOUTHERNER. What's up with that?

Posted

OFFICIAL VOTE COUNT

 

Red (2) -- Basel, Nolder

 

Ishy (1) -- Songstress

 

BG (1) -- Turin

 

Mynd (1) -- Levity

 

Nolder (3) -- Hoof, Red, Mynd

Posted

FOS@Mynd: why always suspicious of the first player to bring someone to 2 votes? seems a bit arbitrary.

And ironically he ends up the first player bringing someone to three :rolleyes:

hehe

Posted

so i think the turin and nolder thang was just some town on town. Although regardless of it being a joke vote or breadcrumming potential lynches. I cant stand when people go straight for the big game. Its no fun and not fair for them.

 

I have no clue whats up with nolder and red..it seems like they are still doing some joke voting. It was quite random. I get the feeling that mynd is a very paranoid person rolleyes.gif

 

How are you so sure that Turin and Nolder are town? The only way you can be sure that at least one of them are town would be if you are mafia and know their alignment already. Likely defending Nolder and linking him with Turin.

Posted

indeed.

 

vote mynd for starting a bandwagon. MUCH more suspicious than putting someone on 2 votes.

 

I gave my reasons - and you should be careful putting your vote on little ol' me.

Posted

Unvote

 

Vote Nolder

 

I am always suspicious of the first player who brings a player to 2 votes on Day 1, with all its supposed randomness and so forth, sneaking in like a mouse peeing on cotton and so forth. Especially going after one who has claimed to be Mon Ami!

not random at all

 

allow me to explain

 

I voted Red for three reasons

 

1. Her unnecessary role hinting (I don't believe she actually claimed gambit did she?)

2. Distracting the town with lighthearted spamming

3. Meta

 

the third reason is really the most important here

Red likes to have her vote on someone at all times usually

even if it's herself

when Red comes into a game late she does a WoT and replies to every little thing she perceives as scummy

she did her WoT but it was all spam this time

and she hadn't voted anyone

this isn't how Red normally plays, she's being oddly cautious

so what did I do? I voted her without explaining anything just to see what she (and others) would do

her prompt OMGUS is all I needed to see to seal the deal

if Red was town I think she still would have OMGUS'd but I think she'd also be concerned about why I had voted her and would ask about it

she didn't and that's why I think she's scum

Posted

Nolder, where do you get role hinting? All she said was that she really liked Gambit. She didn't claim anyone, and I think you're reading waaaaay too much into what she had to say about the X-Men theme here. And if you think she hadn't voted anyone, you really may wish to go back and read her posts, as well as take a look at the vote total. She voted me with an OMGUS right off before switching her vote.

Posted

Nolder, where do you get role hinting? All she said was that she really liked Gambit. She didn't claim anyone, and I think you're reading waaaaay too much into what she had to say about the X-Men theme here. And if you think she hadn't voted anyone, you really may wish to go back and read her posts, as well as take a look at the vote total. She voted me with an OMGUS right off before switching her vote.

what? I didn't say she claimed

Mynd did

 

and she did not vote you

Posted

indeed.

 

vote mynd for starting a bandwagon. MUCH more suspicious than putting someone on 2 votes.

 

I gave my reasons - and you should be careful putting your vote on little ol' me.

 

Threats Mynd? Interesting.

 

VOTE MYND

Posted

indeed.

 

vote mynd for starting a bandwagon. MUCH more suspicious than putting someone on 2 votes.

 

I gave my reasons - and you should be careful putting your vote on little ol' me.

 

Threats Mynd? Interesting.

 

VOTE MYND

 

Oh come on now, you are trying to push me to reveal. How can you possibly get that as a threat? That's stretching - even for me!

Posted

 

@Songstress - One thing that new people to X-men usually get wrong since Wolverine is generally the figurehead... Wolverine's power isn't huge claws, but the power to heal himself instantly. The claws come from expirimentation on him replacing his bones with an indestructable metal.... just sayin.

 

Except didn't he have claws all along, just that they were originally bone claws? I'm going just by the Wolverine prequel movie here, I have very little knowledge of the comic books except for stuff I've heard secondhand. I didn't care much for that installment, while the action scenes were awesome, it kind of dragged otherwise. And it seemed like in all the effort to stay true to the comics, they lost consistency with the existing film continuity. Because someone is bound to say it for their joke vote:

 

Vote: Red

 

OMGUS!!! VOTE: BASEL

 

 

i dunno if Logan started with the claws, but i do know that he ends up getting the antamatium(sp) removed and Gambit kicks his ass some what fierce

 

 

Gambit FTW!

 

 

 

 

Brett Ratner ruined the franchise.

 

brettratner__111109014817.jpg

vote

 

Brett Ratner

 

ah, now theres a wagon i can get behind

 

UNVOTE

 

VOTE: BRETT RATNER

 

I cut out the spam in this quote to avoid a WoT, but it clearly shows that she did vote Basel (though it was not bolded or in red) then switch to Brett Ratner for crimes against humanity. My point is that, even though it was a 2 second joke vote, she did indeed vote Basel.

 

 

I voted Red for three reasons

 

1. Her unnecessary role hinting (I don't believe she actually claimed gambit did she?)

2. Distracting the town with lighthearted spamming

3. Meta

 

A hint is as good as a claim. If you believe she is hinting at being Gambit, why would you say she is not claiming?

 

Nolder, where do you get role hinting? All she said was that she really liked Gambit. She didn't claim anyone, and I think you're reading waaaaay too much into what she had to say about the X-Men theme here. And if you think she hadn't voted anyone, you really may wish to go back and read her posts, as well as take a look at the vote total. She voted me with an OMGUS right off before switching her vote.

what? I didn't say she claimed

Mynd did

 

and she did not vote you

 

And then, after reinforcing the idea that she is "hinting" at her role and using it to vote for her, you throw the blame on Mynd. As the first quote demonstrates, Red did vote for Basel. Thoroughly scummy behavior, Nolder.

Posted

not random at all

 

allow me to explain

 

I voted Red for three reasons

 

1. Her unnecessary role hinting (I don't believe she actually claimed gambit did she?)

2. Distracting the town with lighthearted spamming

3. Meta

 

the third reason is really the most important here

Red likes to have her vote on someone at all times usually

even if it's herself

when Red comes into a game late she does a WoT and replies to every little thing she perceives as scummy

she did her WoT but it was all spam this time

and she hadn't voted anyone

this isn't how Red normally plays, she's being oddly cautious

so what did I do? I voted her without explaining anything just to see what she (and others) would do

her prompt OMGUS is all I needed to see to seal the deal

if Red was town I think she still would have OMGUS'd but I think she'd also be concerned about why I had voted her and would ask about it

she didn't and that's why I think she's scum

 

1st don't skim. in my first post i casted two votes, both legit; so right there your reason is faulty.

 

2nd, spamming isnt' exactly playing cautious. if i was scared of pressure then i'd be lurking :rolleyes:

 

3rd, i did both of those, by OMGUS voting you i knew it would get you to explain your vote.

 

all i'm goign to say is that Metaing me will bite you in the rump Nol. but if you want to role that that, go ahead and bark up my tree. i'm ready to move past the D1 silliness anyways.

 

 

still Gambit is FTW and PWNS all others!! :wub:

 

 

indeed.

 

vote mynd for starting a bandwagon. MUCH more suspicious than putting someone on 2 votes.

 

I gave my reasons - and you should be careful putting your vote on little ol' me.

 

Threats Mynd? Interesting.

 

VOTE MYND

 

 

a semi-half ass reveal threat. utterly scum tastic

 

 

Nol and Mynd seem the best wagons right now imo

Posted

if you guys want to think me talking about my fav X-man is role hinting, then on your own heads be it.

 

 

but i do digress, the ragin cajin is made of pure win :happy:

 

 

and Myn, cut out the bullshanks. that was a role threat to try and stave off votes and pressure. you had to have known your post woudl be read liek that when you posted it.

Posted
OFFICIAL VOTE COUNT

 

Red (2) -- Basel, Nolder

 

Ishy (1) -- Songstress

 

BG (1) -- Turin

 

Mynd (2) -- Levity, Ama

 

Nolder (3) -- Hoof, Red, Mynd

Posted

I cut out the spam in this quote to avoid a WoT, but it clearly shows that she did vote Basel

that was not a vote

 

A hint is as good as a claim. If you believe she is hinting at being Gambit, why would you say she is not claiming?

a role hint is not a role claim and should not be treated as such

 

And then, after reinforcing the idea that she is "hinting" at her role and using it to vote for her, you throw the blame on Mynd. As the first quote demonstrates, Red did vote for Basel. Thoroughly scummy behavior, Nolder.

I didn't try to reinforce anything

I thought that was what she was doing

if she comes in and says she wasn't I'll believe her

 

re: Mynd

again a hint is not a claim, I never said she claimed

Mynd did that

wasn't trying to blame him for it but at the same time I'm not going to take the blame for him either

Posted

1st don't skim. in my first post i casted two votes, both legit; so right there your reason is faulty.

1. All votes must be in BOLD RED

2. Voting for someone not in the game is not a valid vote and obviously wont be counted

 

2nd, spamming isnt' exactly playing cautious. if i was scared of pressure then i'd be lurking :rolleyes:

that's your opinion

I think not casting any votes and/or stepping on anyone's toes is playing cautious

 

3rd, i did both of those, by OMGUS voting you i knew it would get you to explain your vote.

I'm sure you did Red :wub:

Posted

if you guys want to think me talking about my fav X-man is role hinting, then on your own heads be it.

so why don't you do everyone, including yourself, a favor and tell us if you were trying to role hint Gambit or not

Posted

if you guys want to think me talking about my fav X-man is role hinting, then on your own heads be it.

so why don't you do everyone, including yourself, a favor and tell us if you were trying to role hint Gambit or not

 

Pushing for her roleclaim while you are the lead lynch? Where are your manners?

Posted

well...not really

I think it would be helpful for everyone involved if she could clarify whether she was hinting at Gambit or not

if she wasn't I'm not asking her to claim

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...