[DPR Mafia] Vampire Hunter 6 - Game Thread

[DPR]

Let's be honest with each other. I told everybody that this game was going to be a big trap, and the traps will keep coming.

 

The chances of somebody not falling into some of them are exactly 0%. heh

 

To sum up, we are now playing 2 games on 2 seperrate threads. The outcome of the Fast game will greatly influence the outcome of the game.

 

They really, really need to kill any vampires that are there.

 

Wish them luck.

[hotpocket2006]

Good luck guys! Get those vamps!

 

I am glad I was after you John. Also glad that the trap was set. Itll make it interesting. I dont see it as a reason to vote for you like other people not even in this game do lulz

[Sedai]

LOCK'ity lockity lee

 

I just really wish the Paris team would have said something. The Vampires know who is town so if one team can save a member and basically confirm each other at least for a day then the voting pool is narrowed and the chance of hitting scum increases a good bit. But hey hindsight is 20-20 and no matter what unless another member is in danger.

 

confirmed townies are VERY bad in cult games, unless they reveal close to endgame.

 

they become targets for recruitment and killing, and it is pretty pointless to reveal anyway because after the following round of actions, they become suspect again.

 

i find the idea of team-revealing in a game like this scummy.

 

vote jack

 

 

Only if people are slow enough to trust anyone or anything in a DPR game. Three confirmed townies narrows the pool of who might be the original vampires. Take out the originals and then work from there. It's a very legit strategy.

[mottlee]

wow well good luck guys.

 

ok well like min I'm on team Paris, and as she said i am also in a different time zone, so it was the early hours for me when the stuff with sak happened so i didn't know until a couple of hours after she was lynched.

 

I'm going to go back and do a reread to see if anything jumps out at me. there is alot to go through and it's late here so if i don't get it done tonight i will definitely post my views in the morning.

[Sedai]

I <3 DPR just thought people should know that

[WWWwombat]

Yo DPR, might wanna replace Locke with me on that list. Also, I take it I can talk offthread to any team members who may be in this thread but not any who may be in the fast game?

[DPR]

Yes, you can communicate with your teamates off-thread, but NO ONE can communicate with any in the fast game.

[Alanna]

LOCK not sure if we still need to do that, but just in case.

 

Sorry for just checking back in, worked very late last night and then went out and was in no fit state for posting when I got finally got home LOL.

 

I just read through several pages and there didn't seem to be much there. No one is jumping out as scum to me right now. I don't really think there was much to the suspicions on Vamb, but that's just because I'll make fluff posts like that all the time, whether I'm scum or town.

 

It'll be interesting to see the outcome of this fast game.

[ConQuest]

*YAwns* well bloody flamming goats, i guess sleeeping in is a bad idea here now aint it, ill have to check back latter im going to be late for work, last night then three days off, YAY

[ConQuest]

soooo do we have to like, duke it out or something, are we the ones in trouble or are they, why did they get moved or morelikely are they the ones who didnt lock and get left behind in the room with the vamps... ah snap

[Nolder]

ok well like min I'm on team Paris, and as she said i am also in a different time zone, so it was the early hours for me when the stuff with sak happened so i didn't know until a couple of hours after she was lynched.

not calling you a liar

but it is rather convenient that you claimed after Min was locked out from us and can no longer confirm you

is there any reason you didn't claim earlier?

 

@con: I think they're the ones in trouble, but we'll be in BIG trouble if they don't get the vampires

 

@DPR: sorry but I'm a little confused

we can use the QT to talk to people who are still in the same game as us but not with the people in the other game? or we can not use the QT to communicate at all until both games re-merge?

[Nolder]

maybe I should have added some bold to make it easier to read

anyway based on the above I'd say this

 

People to vote

Locke

ineedfourberfs

Red2111

Verbal

Vambram

JLM

 

People to watch (1 vote)

Nolder

Mottlee

Alanna

Leelou

Amadine

 

People to watch (4+ votes)

Conquest

John McClane

Lily

---

so in that case I'm going to add some pressure and Vote: Vambram

ok people that are still in our game:

 

13. John McClane

14. Blackhoof

15. jack D.

16. Song

17. Alanna

18. Amegakure

19. ineedfourberfs

20. Locke

21. ConQuest

22. Mottlee

23. Nolder

---

revised list

 

people to vote

ineedfourberfs

Mottlee

Alanna

Conquest

John McClane

 

note that this list is based on older voting patterns and may not actually be relevant for certain people on it

 

regardless of the people on that list I'm not really interested in voting for JM, INFB, and Mottlee

 

Alanna and Conquest are the ones I'll be making a case on (pending a reread, right now I need to go home...or...not? maybe? ok whenever they're ready to take me I guess >_>)

[amegakure]

With the recent Developments there is a short in people so if we work quickly we might be abble to get a controlled lynch. The only problem is there isn't much to go on right now

 

LOCK'ity lockity lee

 

I just really wish the Paris team would have said something. The Vampires know who is town so if one team can save a member and basically confirm each other at least for a day then the voting pool is narrowed and the chance of hitting scum increases a good bit. But hey hindsight is 20-20 and no matter what unless another member is in danger.

 

confirmed townies are VERY bad in cult games, unless they reveal close to endgame.

 

they become targets for recruitment and killing, and it is pretty pointless to reveal anyway because after the following round of actions, they become suspect again.

 

i find the idea of team-revealing in a game like this scummy.

 

vote jack

 

 

Only if people are slow enough to trust anyone or anything in a DPR game. Three confirmed townies narrows the pool of who might be the original vampires. Take out the originals and then work from there. It's a very legit strategy.

 

I find this scummyy as well when townies reveal it does not do well for anyway. It sounds as if ur encouraging people to reveal which breeds mistrust. And on that not I've always had u pinged for scum so.

 

vote jack

[Nolder]

that post doesn't strike me as scummy

can you explain what else pinged you?

[Sedai]

From your post you seem like you've been told without a doubt I'm scum. You say you've had me pinged from the start. I find that hard to believe because you have offered very little evidence to your case only saying townies revealing is bad. Where in this situation I don't think it is bad. All townies have teammates. Teammates can vet one another. People who haven't been vetted are top suspects as to who are scum is. Ofcourse we can't be sure of anyone after each lynch but we can have a good idea.

[Sedai]

are should be our

[Sedai]

And ameg, in the post you quoted I also said Paris team shouldn't say anything now, because the moment for them to speak up has passed. Just saying

[Blackhoof]

Only if people are slow enough to trust anyone or anything in a DPR game. Three confirmed townies narrows the pool of who might be the original vampires. Take out the originals and then work from there. It's a very legit strategy.

 

until THEY become vampires too. then we have three "confirmed" townies that we would never imagine lynching that are actually vampires!

 

focusing on catching the original vampire team is silly, because while we are confirming townies (a difficult thing to do, really) the vampires are converting them. we can find the original 4 (assuming all teams are equally sized) and lynch them, but by then the converts outnumber us, and we lose.

 

excellent, Team Paris is confirmed now (-1). by the next lynch, they shall all be suspect and possibly lynched. if they havent been killed by the vamps, that is.

[Sedai]

Umm UNVOTE and vote hoof slight slip

 

Hoof I addressed that point in another post.

[Nolder]

oh speaking of slips I totally forgot to address that one that I quoted

it was that you used the word "rite" instead of "right"

 

not really a big deal I just thought it was funny

[ConQuest]

maybe I should have added some bold to make it easier to read

anyway based on the above I'd say this

 

People to vote

Locke

ineedfourberfs

Red2111

Verbal

Vambram

JLM

 

People to watch (1 vote)

Nolder

Mottlee

Alanna

Leelou

Amadine

 

People to watch (4+ votes)

Conquest

John McClane

Lily

---

so in that case I'm going to add some pressure and Vote: Vambram

ok people that are still in our game:

 

13. John McClane

14. Blackhoof

15. jack D.

16. Song

17. Alanna

18. Amegakure

19. ineedfourberfs

20. Locke

21. ConQuest

22. Mottlee

23. Nolder

---

revised list

 

people to vote

ineedfourberfs

Mottlee

Alanna

Conquest

John McClane

 

note that this list is based on older voting patterns and may not actually be relevant for certain people on it

 

regardless of the people on that list I'm not really interested in voting for JM, INFB, and Mottlee

 

Alanna and Conquest are the ones I'll be making a case on (pending a reread, right now I need to go home...or...not? maybe? ok whenever they're ready to take me I guess >_>)

 

So your telling me that You need to vote me because i voted? I may be new to the game but the whole point of it is to find the baddies, right? so by voting i become a baddie? Granted I changed it a couple more times than others but im still figuring out the whole system, i will fall into a role soon enouph

 

in the mean time, im wondering on why your going to think about me on the only thing ive done so far is changed my vote. so far ive seen so many other people being clamed to be scummy yet your avoiding those areas and directing attention else where... THAT IMO is just a little more than suspect in my book...

 

Vote Nolder

 

You really seem to by directing attention where you want it rather than giving good examples...

[hotpocket2006]

Right now I don't see much. Waiting for the other games results I've been following it religiously since it started. I find Jack uber scummy, but I have a feeling that's just his play style, like womby and aemon, but I will be keeping an eye on him.

 

I find nolders list intersting, but not scummy. Voting patterns can give some insight but not this early on in the game.

 

That's all for now.

[Blackhoof]

From way I saw of jack last game mummy is not his playstyle

[Blackhoof]

*scummy lol

[Nolder]

So your telling me that You need to vote me because i voted? I may be new to the game but the whole point of it is to find the baddies, right? so by voting i become a baddie? Granted I changed it a couple more times than others but im still figuring out the whole system, i will fall into a role soon enouph

no not necessarily

 

in my personal opinion vote hoping is usually a scumtell but it doesn't always have to be (god knows I vote hop a lot in later stages of games)

I don't think you're scum exactly

it's just certain peoples voting patterns make them stand out and so I'll be taking a closer look at them

you just happen to be one of those people

 

in the mean time, im wondering on why your going to think about me on the only thing ive done so far is changed my vote. so far ive seen so many other people being clamed to be scummy yet your avoiding those areas and directing attention else where... THAT IMO is just a little more than suspect in my book...

 

Vote Nolder

 

You really seem to by directing attention where you want it rather than giving good examples...

I understand your concern and agree wholeheartedly

when people vote but don't give any solid reasoning it's really annoying and shifty

when I am ready to place a vote I will provide a reason for my vote

first I need to reread those people that stand out and see if I can find any reason to suspect them beyond voting pattern

I'll probably get around to that sometime later tonight